Editorial standards

How this site is written

Editorial standards exist so a reader can decide whether to trust a page on its own merits. This page lists the rules we apply to every piece of content on Starburst India, the way we handle commercial relationships, and how we handle disputed facts.

Where facts come from

How we handle conflicting sources

Starburst is a useful example. Official NetEnt material treats it as a 2012 release, but several affiliate databases still cite 2013. The flagship RTP is listed at 96.09%, but operator-deployed variants run as low as 94.07%. The top payout figure ranges between 500x and 800x stake depending on the source.

Our standard is to surface the disagreement rather than flatten it into a single confident number. If two reputable sources disagree, the page either presents a range with the caveat, or points the reader at the in-game info screen as the final source of truth. We do not pick the number that sounds best.

How affiliate routes affect editorial work

Several casino links on this site are commercial affiliate routes. The site receives a referral fee if you sign up at an operator through one of those links and subsequently deposit. The fee does not change what we write about an operator. A casino that pays a higher commission does not get a softer review — and a casino that pays no commission at all is not excluded from coverage if it deserves a recommendation on editorial grounds.

Where a route is commercial, the link uses rel="nofollow sponsored" and the relationship is disclosed on the relevant page.

How and when content changes

Editorial red lines